Wednesday, December 8, 2021

Chalie AKA Maara - 2

 So...where do I start to pour out what I feel about Charlie ?

May be the starting scene of the film itself where the Heroine gets introduced. At the first look & her first dialogue with an auto driver, Parvathy conveys that she is a "freak" and a good match to Charlie.She in fact proves this truth in the last scene also where she teases Charlie that she is "Shruti Raman" from Pondichery leaving a seasoned Charlie really perplexed. Of course - within couple of minutes -  the femininity within her wakes up and she shouts in a loud voice that she is "Tessa" not wanting to lose him. What a characterisation ? Directors may conceive ideas but the artiste needs to give birth with all the hard work and pain, isn't it ? She is a typical hyppie never self conscious about her dress and in fact wears wrong set of chappals which was pointed out by her friend  (Hyppie - Urban Dictionary : To be hyper and happy at the same time, or to get hyper from to much happyness)

There are too many things to write about this character - for her boldness (she speaks with alien / men quite casually without the typical feminine posing), for her child likeness (winks and plays fun  with a child during travel & gets absorbed looking at the Kathakali dancer in his full costume when she gets a chance to sit with him on a truck top), for her boldness to go in search of her curiosity to find "her" man, last but not the least. her sensuality. An actor  must have done lot of  research for this portrayal (note she had no earlier language film to watch unlike her bete-noire in the tamil film (Shraddha Srinath)

Lets go to the hero Charlie - a muscular / rough but handsome / nice-with-people  - he carries his weight quite unassumingly through out the film quite effortlessly. He does not mind pissing in the middle of the road (ok, it was night time but he is not some one who will hesitate to do it in broad day light), he re-christens names of people as per his whims and fancies (Mathai as Pathrose, Mariama as Queen Mary, Dsouza (thief) as Kalla Sunni) but still every one around him love for what he is. He is portrayed as a real nomad without any sentiments (unlike Tamil where Madhavan is bit more mellowed and sort of "warm" chocolate boy who gotten older - lets go to Tamil film in next post ok ? ) whose relationship with Kunjappan is some thing to be researched upon. They have lot of affection for each other but just keep fighting as though it is their language of love. This should be one of Dulkar's career best film for many reasons - first is that this is not a regular kind of character. I don't really want to add more and more of his heroics since there are too many other beauties of the film about which I need to talk about. IN short, Dulkar should have made Mamooty proud if his "even more" busy father happened to watch this film in full. (He would have told "en raasaa !!" and "katti pudichu oru umma" for sure)

Well, coming to other key characters of this film, when I saw the film for the first time without sub titles, I felt their introduction scenes of the various characters and the dialogues were too abrupt but then, when i watched later with sub titles, most of the characters were full fledged - though they are not in "apple to apple" in comparison to Tamil. What to do...in Tamil, characters have to even think loud and feel noisily !! There were in fact few characters (the first visitor to the new home of heroine who walks in casually and collects his stuff, the little boy who comes to do house keeping, the Doctor who gets wild in the Obituary party organized by Charlie) but they got fit into the film quite well ; In fact the fact is that mallu version is shorter by 15 minutes just goes to prove that there was no redundancy and it was more power packed.

Nedumudi Venu's character was much shorter (in terms of minutes he fills the screen) compared to Mouli (Tamil) who perhaps needed lot more minute to show his dramatics and histrionics (melodramatic behaviour designed to attract attention).  In one particular scene he tells to Parvathy "mazhai ..premam....and how they help to progress a love affair -  in a poetic manner to tell us all that he is not a rude guy as we perceived him. It was also poetic when he tells Parvathi as she arrives "2 days stay..that is the niyamam here".  I was admiring the fact that his emotional past was quite easily brought up in the film in a "lot more" light conversation amongst his house mates and I particularly noticed that the meeting with his past love was devoid of any emotion - either to him nor to us. But then what wells up our emotion is when  he wants to send off some coffee powder and tea leaves to Thrishur and when he breaks down in the room only in the company of his Charlie !! These scenes are poems by themselves.

Music was fantastic (with a number rendered by Dulkar (Sundari penne) coming in film at various points); Camera was excellent with the views and the angles (particularly the long still shots of the scene when Charlie adventures with the thief - each of the pose of the pencil drawing is nicely shown frozen in camera to help our recap); No flaw in editing that was at least noticeable to me. Last but not the least who can forget the Pooram festival climax which should have gained respect all over the world to Enta Keralam - thru this film.

Well, what makes a good film..?? Gentlemen....Ladies...think about it. Of course good story, screenplay, direction, dialogues, music...? what else... Huh..?

Its about the defining moments that remain frozen in our mind for long time - shall I start listing them for you ? The scene where parvathy is pulled in by a lustful guy inside a lodge room and Dulkar passes by...will you ever forget those expression of parvathy and manly walk of Dulkar ? Another scene is when Dulkar actually crosses the car of Parvathy who was in deep thought and does not even notice him - Dulkar's wide stretched arm / hand comes quite close to the window of the car.  Parvathy running behind the Jeep just before intermission is another scene to remember for more than one reason, is'nt it ? Just one more - the photo of Dulkar with parvathy in polaraid camera gets converted to one taken at the time of first "unknown" meeting of Parvathy with him.  

What more to add ? Any thing you try to add to this post is not going to match the film experience.

Krishnaarpanam....as always

Regards // Suren



















Monday, December 6, 2021

Charlie AKA Maara

Prelude : 

A post after a full 2.5 years.... oops....

Nothing ever starts afresh - so does nothing ends without a trace. 

Universe always operates with the principle of "punarapi jananam, punarapi maranam " and  I learnt that the word "avatar" just means "coming again" ; So neither entry nor exit gets more significant than "being" in universe.

 Dear All

I always have a flair for Remade Films ; Enjoying the individual styles of screenplay & customisation for "local audience", I like to compare and contrast the two films allowing myself the luxury of seeing the film in each language at least twice to take my analysis to a different level of depth. This blog contains my outpourings on Wednesday AKA Unnai pol Oruvan and Dhrishyam AKA Papanasam. which are the top of my memory still. In both the films I had watched the original non tamil version first (Hindi in the case of former &  Malayalam for the latter) and got into a RAGE when I saw the tamil version. The popular view of cinema field is that  Tamil audience needs more verbalisation and an extra pinch of sentiments and emotions. The "rawness" in Tamil version was too visible for me  in both the references above and I could not tolerate the manner Kamal killed the soul of the original version. However I felt Vasool Raja MBBS was one notch higher than Munnabhai  (though I still consider as an exception only). Another remade film that really amused me was 3 Idiots AKA Nanban where I was even enjoying even the cast of the Tamil version almost resembled the Original Hindi version.

Well, this post is about Maara AKA Charlie. I saw Maara right on the date of its release in Amazon way back during Jan 2021; some how was destined to see it again and again on 3 more consecutive days and there after another 2 / 3 times during the course of year. Just to put it straight, I thoroughly enjoyed it. I did hear that the original malayalam movie was lot better and in fact it was mentioned in the Ananda Vikatan's film review too - inspite of giving good rating to the tamil version.  I developed a  strong urge to also see Charlie - the original version which was released 6 years back for my "compare and contrast" game. Unfortunately, I could not find it in Netflix or Amazon and the free download available at a site had a very poor film quality without subtitles. My expectation got built up as for the first time, I had the situation in my hand where I saw the Tamil remade film first and it was a big question for me if the original could be better than Maara !!

It took such a long time to fetch a really good copy of the film with sub-titles thru a friend and during the course of Nov until today I watched Charlie few times (yep  3 times) before writing this post. The first time, I watched it without any subtitles - quite sincerely to get max out of the film's originality, I felt it was bit abrupt and with too much "gaps" which substantially got evaporated as I saw it next couple of times with sub-titles. This is also a well made movie and here I am sitting shell shocked at the discovery that - for the first time - I am enjoying both the films with their own intrinsic beauty and depth, few points where one film was few notches higher than the other & vice-versa in few other scenes / depiction.

This is going to be a series of posting as I will dig deep into Charlie in my next one and then sum up my observations on Maara in last post & there are two reasons for the order of posts. Yes chronologically Charlie is the first one and so it is fair it write about it before Maara but then, since a tamil film has at last broken my earlier perception, it is perfect to have a last word on Maara.  

Well, why this post ? 

When we are awe struck with too many thoughts;  it is better to vent it out, isn't it good for us ? After all no thought process should be allowed deep enough inside us and get us moored with those "got-over" stuff or past tense. To keep ourselves engaged and involved with active present, I feel its important to shirk off the past baggage and things that entangle us to the past. 

So do you think the last para was too much nonsense ?? I call it yoga or the process of moving out of deep impressions ("vriddhi"). 

Love // Suchoo